USPTO serial 86076016
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
P JAY HINES MUNCY GEISSLER OLDS & LOWE PC4000 LEGATO ROAD SUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033-2898UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Seasonings, and flavorings combined in unitary packages; Rice and seasoning mix combined in unitary packages; Instant noodles; Noodles; Rice noodles; Noodles, seasonings and edible oil combined in unitary packages; Bean-starch noodles and seasoning mixes combined in unitary packages; Rice noodles and seasoning mixes combined in unitary packages; Packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Seasoned coating for meat, fish, poultry; Seasoned coating mixtures for foods; Seasoning mixes; Seasoning mixes for soups; Seasoning pastes; Seasonings; Cooking salt; Cooking sauces; Condiments, namely fish sauce, mushroom sauce, oyster sauce, pepper spice and shrimp sauce; Curry; Curry powder being spice; Curry pastes; Curry sauce; Miso bean paste; Mustard; Pepper; Relish; Roasted and ground sesame seeds used as a seasoning; Sauces; Sauce mixes; Soy sauce; Soy bean paste; Spices; Seasonings, namely, furikake consisting primarily of mixtures of roasted sesame, laver, seaweed, dried vegetables, Dried seafood, preserved fish, preserved shrimp and spices,; Monosodium glutamate used as a flavor enhancer for food; Tapioca; Flour for food; Sago; Yeast, baking powder and flavourings, other than essential oils, for foods | ABANDONED | Sep 16, 2013 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |