USPTO serial 86077424
CIPHERTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5283352Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2017
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CIPHERTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Set-top boxes for delivering and streaming television and video programming content | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 2013 |
| 038 | Secure Internet protocol television (IPTV) transmission broadcasting services using set-top boxes, smart phones, tablet computers and computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AEBC Internet Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by AEBC Internet Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by AEBC Internet Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named CIPHERTV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 27, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 27, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |