USPTO serial 86077814
DROPTINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DROPTINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan K. Wheelock
BRYAN K WHEELOCK HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE PLC7700 BONHOMME AVESTE 400SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105-0032Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Ammunition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |