USPTO serial 86079474
KLEER TRIMBOARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2017
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with KLEER TRIMBOARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WESTLAKE ROYAL BUILDING PRODUCTS INC.
HOUSTON, TX, US
Other trademarks owned by WESTLAKE ROYAL BUILDING PRODUCTS INC.
TAPCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Wixom, MI, US
WIXOM, MI, US
TAPCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Wixom, MI, US
TAPCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Wixom, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda K. Russell
Linda K. Russell Legal Dept2801 Post Oak Blvd, Suite 600Houston, TX 77056UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metal building products, namely, lumber made of manmade and synthetic materials, namely, cellular PVC; lumber of manmade and synthetic materials, namely, cellular PVC, for use as fascia, rakes, band boards, corner boards, frieze boards, casings, soffits; non-metal architectural mouldings and exterior finish trim of synthetic and manmade materials, namely, cellular PVC; non-metal decorative exterior mouldings and decorative exterior trim of synthetic and manmade materials, namely, cellular PVC, for use in building construction; building materials, namely, cellular PVC trim, none of the foregoing being composed of wood and all of the foregoing being exclusively composed of cellular PVC | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WESTLAKE ROYAL BUILDING PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TAPCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BORAL BUILDING PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TAPCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by TAPCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named KLEER TRIMBOARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2017 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 3, 2017 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 1, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |