USPTO serial 86080923
JOHN PALMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOHN PALMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Christopherson
DANIEL CHRISTOPHERSON LEHRMAN BEVERAGE LAW PLLC2911 HUNTER MILL RDSUITE 303OAKTON, VA 22124Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Testing equipment, namely, apparatus for measuring pH in aqueous solutions, gravity measuring instruments, apparatus for measuring ion concentrations of Ca, SO4, CACO3, and O2 in aqueous solutions, electronic apparatus for testing the electrical conductivity of acqueous solutions, thermometers, and temperature indicators | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Beer brewing equipment kits comprising beer fermentation jugs, carboys, non-metal jugs, caps, airlocks, siphons and tubing, manually operated apparatus for filling drinking bottles with liquid, manually operated apparatus for capping bottles, metal bottle caps, cleaning brushes, and spray sanitizers and cleaners, all sold as a unit; Brewing ingredient processing equipment, namely, hand-operated grain mills, hand-operated hop mills, hand operated spinner for cleaning hops, grain and hop bags for household use, and storage equipment, namely, containers for household or kitchen use, all sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Shirts, Hats, Footwear, Pants, Shorts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Palmer Brewing Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Palmer Brewing Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named JOHN PALMER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |