USPTO serial 86081285
DROPGLOBAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLSEN, EMILY K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DROPGLOBAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC VAUGHN-FLAM
ERIC VAUGHN-FLAM SANDERS ORTOLI VAUGHN-FLAM ROSENSTADT LLP501 MADISON AVE FL 14NEW YORK, NY 10022-5616UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | The applicant hereby submits an updated list of identification for goods in compliance with the examining attorney's suggestions: Apparel, namely pants, shorts, shirts, t-shirts, long sleeve shirts, three-quarter length shirts, pullovers, sweatshirts, hooded sweatshirts, sweaters; jackets, coats, vests; socks, underwear; swimwear, bathing suits, bathing trunks, beach robes, beachwear, wetsuits; snow suits; headwear, hats, beanies, gloves, mittens; belts, scarves, neckerchiefs; footwear, shoes, sneakers, sandals, flip flops, boots, high boots | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2013 |
| 028 | The applicant hereby submits an updated list of identification for goods in compliance with the examining attorney's suggestions: Sports equipment, namely surfboards, snowboards, skateboards, skateboard decks, and replacement parts for the aforesaid goods; skateboard accessories, namely, wheels, bearings, risers, trucks, pads, helmets; snowboard accessories, namely bindings, wax | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2013 |
| 038 | The applicant hereby submits an updated list of identification for goods in compliance with the examining attorney's suggestions: Global communication service, namely providing online forums and electronic messaging in the fields of surfing, snowboarding, skateboarding; through social networking and microblogging via the global computer and wireless networks, including but not limited to the internet, mobile phones, VOIP, and IP technology | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2013 |
| 042 | The applicant hereby submits an additional class of goods with the following identification per the examining attorney's suggestion: Global communication service, providing online forums and electronic messaging in the fields of surfing, snowboarding, skateboarding; through social networking and microblogging via the global computer and wireless networks, including but not limited to the internet, mobile phones, VOIP, and IP technology; creating an online community for registered users to engage in social networking and microblogging, and providing online chat rooms for social networking. Drop Global members receive access to an interactive map comprised of "board sport" athletes and are encouraged to post content related to their surf, skate and snow experiences to build a global community of athletes of similar interests | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Drop Global LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DROPGLOBAL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| May 14, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 7, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |