Drawing for CAROLINA'S SUMMER HUMMER

USPTO serial 86081482

CAROLINA'S SUMMER HUMMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAROLINA'S SUMMER HUMMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil M. Batavia

J RHOADES WHITE JR DORITY & MANNING PAPO BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033alcoholic beverages, namely, distilled liquors and distilled spiritsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 14, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 3, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 3, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 21, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 1, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 30, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 13, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 10, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 10, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 10, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 1, 2014PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 17, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance