Drawing for Serial No. 86081705

USPTO serial 86081705

Serial No. 86081705

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 86081705?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ian L. Saffer

IAN L SAFFER SWANSON & BRATSCHUN LLC8210 SOUTHPARK TERRACELITTLETON, CO 80120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018All-purpose reusable carrying bags; Drawstring bags; Textile shopping bagsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2015MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 24, 2015ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 24, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2015OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 2, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2014OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 28, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 28, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance