USPTO serial 86081900
VEGANGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEGANGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody H. Drake
JODY H DRAKE SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Capsules made of vegetable material containing bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry detergent use; capsules made of polysaccharide (starch), in particular in combination with Gellan, sold as a unit dose containing beauty care and cosmetic products, namely, soaps, essential oils, beauty creams and liquids, and hair lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Capsules made of vegetable material sold empty for pharmaceutical purposes and capsules made of vegetable material sold as a unit dose for pharmaceutical preparations and dietetic substances, all for the medical treatment of, namely, infectious diseases, gastro-intestinal problems and indigestion, diuretic problems, rheumatic complaints and chronic joint and muscle pain, anxiety and variability of moods, vitamin deficiency symptoms, overweight, heart diseases and circulation problems, women's diseases, as well as for nutritional supplements, namely, plant extracts and plant oils, krill oils, fish oils and cod liver oil and other marine or vegetable omega-3 oils, vitamins, minerals, amino acids and amino sugars, CoQlO, antioxidants, polyphenols and other nutrients that are common for food supplements; capsules made of polysaccharide (starch), in particular in combination with Gellan, sold empty or as a unit dose for pharmaceutical and neutraceutical preparations and dietetic substances for medical use and food additives | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SWISS CAPS RECHTE UND LIZENZEN AG
- Other trademarks owned by SWISS CAPS RECHTE UND LIZENZEN AG
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named VEGANGEL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |