USPTO serial 86082110
NC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Champlain (Québec), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Pelletier, Jr.
GEORGE A. PELLETIER, JR. CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH ST FL 22HARTFORD, CT 06103-1253UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements for human or animal general health and well-being, namely, dietary and nutritional supplements in the form of powdered drink mixes, tablets, bars, powders, nutritional drinks, and liquid drink mixes; Dietary supplements for treatment and prevention of human or pet/animal diseases, disorders and conditions, namely, allergic diseases, cognitive, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases; Dietary supplements for human or animal consumption and maintain good health; Nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement for human or animal; Dietary supplements adapted for medical or veterinarian purposes; High concentrated extracts from fruits and vegetables for use as a dietary supplements for human or animal | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services regarding research and development, formulation development, quality control, clinical evaluation, in the field of natural health products, cosmetics ingredients, nutritional extracts and pharmaceuticals; Scientific research and development in the field of plant and fruit nutritional science, natural products science, food science and human and animal food nutrition; Nutraceutical, cosmetic, dietary and nutritional supplements research services; Biological research; Scientific research and development of high quality extracts from fruits and vegetables; Research and development of new products and technologies for others in the field of biotechnology; scientific consultancy in relation to extraction of high concentrated extracts of fruits and vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |