Drawing for COCOLICIOUS

USPTO serial 86082215

COCOLICIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COCOLICIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

XAVIER MORALES

XAVIER MORALES LAW OFFICE OF XAVIER MORALESPO BOX 6510SAN ANTONIO, TX 78209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyeglasses; Eyewear; Eyewear, namely, sunglasses, eyeglasses and ophthalmic frames and cases therefor; Reading glasses; SunglassesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 19, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 19, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 19, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 19, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 19, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 24, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 24, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 4, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 16, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 15, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 19, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 14, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 5, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 2, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 18, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 17, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 11, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Oct 10, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance