USPTO serial 86082603
RED HOUND AUTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2018
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with RED HOUND AUTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terence J. Linn
Terence J. Linn Gardner, Linn, Burkhart & Ondersma LLP2900 Charlevoix Drive SE, Suite 300GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land and watercraft vehicle aftermarket parts, namely, vehicle door and tailgate handles, namely, RV door handles and camper door handles, vehicle door, window and tailgate hinges and locks, drink holders for vehicles, boat cleats, gas springs, trailer hitch locks, trailer hitch coupling locks, trailer hitch balls, trailer hitch receiver extensions, [ hitch-mounted cargo carriers, hitch-mounted bicycle carriers, removable cargo bags for attachment to vehicles, luggage nets for vehicles, ] organizer boxes and trays specially adapted for fitting in vehicles, [ pet barriers, ] tire-mounted steps for facilitating vehicle access, [ vehicle-mounted boot scrubber brushes, ] metal hose clamps and fittings, vehicle light bezels, license plate covers and frames, tow hooks, [ vehicle mirrors, ] namely, side view mirrors, [ rearview mirrors, and replacement mirror elements, ] mud flaps, spoilers, sun visor clips, tailgate clips and rods, trailer frame clips, steps for attachment to vehicles, vehicle cabin ventilation vents, windshield wiper cowls [ , window rain deflectors; ] tow chains; safety chains in the nature of towing security chains for vehicles [ ; magnetic fender covers ] | ACTIVE | Jun 2, 2014 |
| 027 | Floor mats for vehicles | ACTIVE | May 7, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 19, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |