Drawing for INTELLIGENT DATA HARMONIZATION

USPTO serial 86082613

INTELLIGENT DATA HARMONIZATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIGENT DATA HARMONIZATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Spoor Gard

JULIA SPOOR GARD BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3506UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, creating computer network-based indexes of information using smart profiling based on data shape, data structure and semantics to eliminate the need for pre-modeling every metric, dimension and attribute to speed the process of conveying data on-demand to go from data sources to converged insight; data semantic recognition using smart profiling based on data shape, data structure and semantics to eliminate the need for pre-modeling every metric, dimension and attribute to speed the process from source data-to-insightACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 23, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 22, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance