Drawing for ECHARGE

USPTO serial 86082637

ECHARGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECHARGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Lutz

Christopher J. Lutz Chapin IP Law, LLC352 Turnpike Road, Suite 110Southborough, MA 01772UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Solar powered systems to generate and store energy for the transportation industry, namely, battery trickle charger systems comprising solar panels, a solar charge controller and connecting cables and wires, truck and trailer lift gate systems comprising solar panels, a solar charge controller and connecting cables and wires, in-cab truck no idle air conditioning systems comprising solar panels, a solar charge controller and connecting cables and wires and truck and trailer emergency safety lighting systems, comprising solar panels, a solar charge controller and connecting cables and wiresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 31, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 31, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 18, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 23, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 11, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 21, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 21, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 12, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 12, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 27, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance