Drawing for BEAUTY SHAKER AWARDS

USPTO serial 86082675

BEAUTY SHAKER AWARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUONG, SUI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAUTY SHAKER AWARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Sherman

ROBERT L SHERMAN PAUL HASTINGS LLP75 E 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10022-3404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Employee recruitment and retention program, namely, conducting employee incentive award programs to promote innovation, quality and productivityACTIVEDec 17, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 15, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 15, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 4, 2015EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 20, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 20, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 19, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 19, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance