USPTO serial 86082754
STEWART OLD GLORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEWART OLD GLORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Figline Valdarno (FI), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
JEFFREY B. SLADKUS, ESQ. THE SLADKUS LAW GROUP1827 POWERS FERRY RD SE BLDG 6ATLANTA, GA 30339-5687UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Attache cases; Briefcases; Canvas shopping bags; Clutch bags; Duffle bags; Garment bags for travel; Handbags; Keycases; Leather cases; Leather shopping bags; Mesh shopping bags; Purses; Rucksacks; Shoulder bags; Suitcases; Tote bags; Vanity cases sold empty; Waist packs; Wallets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Bathing suits; Bathrobes; Belts for clothing; Blouses; Boots; Caps; Cardigans; Clogs; Coats; Dresses; Gloves; Hats; Hosiery; Jackets; Jeans; Jerseys; Jumpers; Men's suits; Neckties; Over coats; Overalls; Pantyhose; Parkas; Pullovers; Rain coats; Sandals; Scarves; Shawls; Shirts; Shoes; Shorts; Skirts; Slippers; Sweaters; Sweatshirts; T-shirts; Trousers; Underwear; Vests; Waistcoats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |