USPTO serial 86082918
THE REEL DUCK PLUMBERS TAPE DISPENSER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE REEL DUCK PLUMBERS TAPE DISPENSER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodland Hills, CA
Woodland Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Henricks
JAMES A. HENRICKS HENRICKS, SLAVIN & HOLMES LLP840 APOLLO ST STE 200EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-4737UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal dispensers for metal plumbers tape, non-adhesive metal tape, metal hanger straps and metal wire | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of the Mark and Connie Foreman family trust, a California Trust, the trustees comprising of Marc Foreman and Connie Foreman, US citizens
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of the Mark and Connie Foreman family trust, a California Trust, the trustees comprising of Marc Foreman and Connie Foreman, US citizens
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named THE REEL DUCK PLUMBERS TAPE DISPENSER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |