USPTO serial 86082970
PRICETRAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRICETRAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ugam Solutions Private Limited
Goregaon (W), Mumbai, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Bourque
DANIEL BOURQUE BOURQUE & ASSOCIATES835 HANOVER ST STE 301MANCHESTER, NH 03104-5401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Cost price analysis, business information, business management assistance, advertising, business administration, compilation of information into computer databases, management advisory services for business, business consultancy, business research, statistical information, systemization of information into computer data bases, updating of advertising material and compilation, business research concerning activities of competitors, and providing business information and business reports concerning activities of competitors, all such services excluding and not provided to the grocery industry and the beer, wine and spirits industries | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 4, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2015 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jan 31, 2015 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |