USPTO serial 86083631
D'CRAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with D'CRAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Diamond Bar, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Biscuits and bread; Bread; Bread and buns; Bread and pastry; Bread bases; Bread doughs; Bread flavoured with spices; Bread mixes; Bread rolls; Bread sticks; Bread with soy bean; Bruschetta-topped bread; Burgers contained in bread rolls; Chocolate for confectionery and bread; Coatings for foods made of breading; Corn bread; Crisp bread; Danish bread; Donuts; Flat bread; Food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies; Frozen breads; Frozen dough for use as pizza, bread or other bread-type products; Frozen foods, namely, grain and bread based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; Fruit breads; Garlic bread; Low-salt bread; Mixes for making breading; Rolls; Wholemeal bread | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2024 | CRAF | AMENDMENT CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |