USPTO serial 86084077
DON'T TAKE MY FRIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DON'T TAKE MY FRIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, computer application software for mobile phones, smart phones, computers and tablets featuring skill and action games; computer game software; computer software applications featuring skill and action games; downloadable computer game programs; downloadable game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; pre-recorded videotapes, CDs, and DVDs featuring activities for children, computer games, recorded television programs and audio books featuring children's games and activities, and instructions for use of the games | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, games and playthings, namely, board games, parlor games, app-enabled games, and hand-held electronic game units adapted for use with mobile phones, smart phones, computers and tablets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |