CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for JUSTIN IDEA

USPTO serial 86084369

JUSTIN IDEA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUSTIN IDEA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcella Ballard

Marcella Ballard Venable LLPP.O. Box 34385Washington, DC 20043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Music composition services; Poem and lyric writing; Scriptwriting services for non-advertising purposes; Song writing services for non-advertising purposes; Writing of textsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 5, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 12, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 29, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 27, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 27, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 5, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 28, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2014INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Nov 20, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 28, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 28, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance