Drawing for SLICE 'N' SEAL

USPTO serial 86085382

SLICE 'N' SEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLICE 'N' SEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert N. Cook

Robert N. Cook WHITHAM & COOK, P.C. | W&C IP11491 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 340RESTON, VA 20190-5244UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Bag clamps, namely, metal bag clamps provided with a blade mechanism to allow for the opening of sealed bags of food and the resealing of the opened bags of food; and bag clips, namely, metal bag clips provided with a blade mechanism to allow for the opening of sealed bags of food and the resealing of the opened bags of foodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2020MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 10, 2020ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 7, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 2, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 2, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 26, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 11, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 7, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 7, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance