USPTO serial 86085982
HOLESHOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOLESHOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Guelph, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Saidman
PERRY J. SAIDMAN SAIDMAN DESIGNLAW GROUP LLC8601 GEORGIA AVE STE 603SILVER SPRING, MD 20910-3441UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; electrolyte supplements to be used in water for general health and well-being and athletic performance; dietary supplements to be used in water for general health and well-being and athletic performance; herbal supplements to be used in water for general health and well-being and athletic performance; herbal supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; nutritional supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; dietary supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; health supplements, namely, electrolyte, dietary, food, herbal, and nutritional health supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; protein supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; vitamin supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; mineral supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; vitamin and mineral supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; sports supplements, namely, electrolyte, dietary, food, herbal, and nutritional sports supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; bodybuilding supplements, namely, electrolyte, dietary, food, herbal, and nutritional bodybuilding supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; nutraceutical dietary supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; energy supplements, namely, electrolyte, dietary, food, herbal, and nutritional energy supplements for general health and well-being and athletic performance; vitamins; vitamin enriched water; vitamin fortified water beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Energy drinks; drinking water with vitamins; flavored water with vitamins, caffeine, and natural sweeteners | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic energy drinks, namely, ready-to-drink alcoholic energy drinks with vodka additive; alcoholic energy drink with vodka additive | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |