USPTO serial 86086931
THE CITY AS A SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CITY AS A SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
JULIE L. DALKE LATHAM & WATKINS LLP650 TOWN CENTER DR STE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626-7135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting research, development and education in the field of climate change, environment, energy conservation, alternative energy resources, natural resource protection issues, and pollution abatement; promoting public awareness of climate change, environment, energy conservation, alternative energy resources, natural resource protection issues, pollution abatement, and governmental energy conservation initiatives; public advocacy and public policy research to promote awareness of climate change, environmental and energy conservation, alternative energy resources, natural resource protection issues, pollution abatement and the importance of traditional and renewable energy production and energy efficiency; legislative and regulatory advocacy services, namely, promoting legislation, regulation, policies, and reforms that support sound energy policies; association services, namely, providing regulatory and legislative advocacy services in support of the marketing of energy and energy-related services, information, products, and technologies and in support of promoting funding of emerging clean technology companies; promotional advertising of services of third parties through co-sponsoring arrangements relating to educational classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of climate change, environmental and energy conservation, alternative energy resources, natural resource protection issues, pollution abatement and the importance of traditional and renewable energy production and energy efficiency | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | education services, namely, providing classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of climate change, environmental and energy conservation, alternative energy resources, natural resource protection issues, pollution abatement and the importance of traditional and renewable energy production and energy efficiency; arranging or conducting classes, seminars or workshops in the fields of global warming, climate change and the environment and governmental energy conservation initiatives, and distribution of course materials in connection therewith; providing online newsletters in the fields of global warming and the environment; providing online non-downloadable educational newsletters containing information regarding global warming, climate change and the environment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cleantech San Diego Association
- Other trademarks owned by Cleantech San Diego Association
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE CITY AS A SYSTEM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |