Drawing for IT'S NOT A REPLACEMENT ANYTHING, IT'S WHAT'S POSSIBLE WITH LIGHT

USPTO serial 86087011

IT'S NOT A REPLACEMENT ANYTHING, IT'S WHAT'S POSSIBLE WITH LIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IT'S NOT A REPLACEMENT ANYTHING, IT'S WHAT'S POSSIBLE WITH LIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle P. Ciotola

MICHELLE P. CIOTOLA CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH ST FL 22HARTFORD, CT 06103-1253UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011LED (light emitting diode) light bulbs; Illumination systems comprised primarily of LED light bulbs, LED light pods, LED lamps, LED lamps and their fittings, LED lighting fixtures or LED luminaries; LED retrofit lamps, bulbs and fixtures; LED-based outdoor, street and roadway lights; LED lighting systems comprised of LED lamps, LED lighting fixtures, remote controls and software for controlling and/or for automatic adjusting of the foregoing; LED lamps, LED lighting fixtures, and LED lighting systems comprised of LED modules, power supplies and wiringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 13, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 11, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 9, 2014PBMRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
May 31, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 31, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance