Drawing for PLAYTABASE

USPTO serial 86087426

PLAYTABASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLAYTABASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Lasky

MICHAEL B LASKY SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER PAPO BOX 2938MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0938UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Remote control, namely, a wearable device which controls physical, digital, electrical and electronic objects and devices by gesture; a kinetic interface device, namely, a wearable computer; wireless transmitters and receivers for receiving signals from wearable devices; all of the above specifically excluding use with audio signalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 2015TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jul 13, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 13, 2015OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 18, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 4, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance