USPTO serial 86088536
SYNAPTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYNAPTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
JAMES A LOWE GAUNTLETT & ASSOCIATES18400 VAN KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 300IRVINE, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | information technology consulting services; Planning, design and management of information technology systems; Integration of computer systems and networks; computer software development; Computer technical support services, namely, service desk or help desk services for IT infrastructure, operating systems, database systems, and web applications; Computer programming services for others in the field of software configuration management; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) systems and the software applications of others; consulting services concerning design and development of computer software programs and architecture and computer hardware architecture | ACTIVE | Aug 4, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2018 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |