Drawing for M

USPTO serial 86088639

M

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jie (Lisa) Li

Jie (Lisa) Li Greenberg Traurig, LLP4 Embarcadero Center Suite 3000San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising servicesACTIVE—
042Software design and development services; software consultation services; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for erasing installed caches and residual files, for managing applications and background tasks, and for managing user history; Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for managing and optimizing performance of applications, background tasks and memory; software design and development services for erasing installed caches and residual files, for managing applications and background tasks, and for managing user history; software consulting services for erasing installed caches and residual files, for managing applications and background tasks, and for managing user history; software application service provider for erasing installed caches and residual files, for managing applications and background tasks, and for managing user historyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 1, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 19, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 19, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 13, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 27, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 28, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 15, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 15, 2014ZZAXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU—
Sep 15, 2014ISIUWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE(NOA)-ITU REQUEST—
Sep 11, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 2, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance