USPTO serial 86088655
V IN VOLTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4718889Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 14, 2015
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with V IN VOLTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Radha Krushn Communications, Inc.
Fremont, CA
Radha Krushn Communications, Inc.
Fremont, CA
Radha Krushn Communications, Inc.
Fremont, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew H. Swyers
344 MAPLE AVE W STE 151VIENNA, VA 22180-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for mobile phones, portable media players and handheld computers, namely, software for collecting performance measurement data from mobile devices and telecommunication networks in the field of wireless communications; downloadable mobile applications for collecting performance measurement data from mobile devices and telecommunication networks in the field of wireless communications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 12, 2013 |
| 038 | Voice over wireless networks services, namely, voice over IP services and voice over LTE (Long Term Evolution) services in the nature of high-speed wireless broadband communication and wireless telephone services; telecommunications consultation regarding optimizing performance levels of vocal and video communications and signal transmissions in wired and wireless communications networks; video services, namely, video transmission over digital networks, video broadcasting, streaming of video chat material on the Internet, video telephone services, video teleconferencing and video conferencing services all via wired and wireless communications networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 12, 2013 |
| 042 | Measurement evaluations in the field of wired and wireless communications networks regarding the quality of vocal and video signals and performance levels of vocal and video communications and signal transmissions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 12, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Radha Krushn Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Radha Krushn Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Radha Krushn Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named V IN VOLTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |