USPTO serial 86089963
MIYACHI AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROMER, ZACHARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIYACHI AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Art Hasan
ART HASAN CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | INDUSTRIAL LASERS FOR SPOT AND SEAM WELDING, FOR PRECISION NON-CONTACT WELDING AND CHEMICAL FREE MARKING OF MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS; FIBER LASER CUTTING MACHINES; LASER MARKING MACHINES; LASER WELDING WORKSTATIONS, NAMELY, SYSTEMS FOR MARKING, CUTTING, BONDING AND WELDING COMPRISED OF LASER WELDING, MARKING AND CUTTING MACHINES TOGETHER WITH ASSOCIATED POWER SUPPLIES AND PROGRAMMING AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE WELDERS; SEAM SEALING PROJECTION WELDING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SEAM SEALING PROJECTION WELDING MACHINES AND ASSOCIATED PROGRAMMING AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT; WELDING ELECTRODES; PRECISION BONDING AND WELDING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, OPTICAL ILLUMINATOR SYSTEMS COMPRISING A HOUSING, LIGHT SOURCE WITHIN THE HOUSING, FIBER OPTICS, AND MAGNIFYING OPTICS, ALL FOR USE IN BONDING AND WELDING OF ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND SEMICONDUCTORS; AUTOGENOUS REFLOW SOLDERING MACHINES CONTAINING A POWER SOURCE AND REFLOW TRANSFORMER; ELECTRIC WELDING AND SOLDERING APPARATUS, NAMELY, FORCE CONTROLLERS USING AIR FLOW VALVES, SOLENOIDS, AND AIR FLOW REGULATORS TO CONTROL WELDING HEADS IN RESISTANCE WELDING AND REFLOW SOLDERING APPLICATIONS; ELECTRIC WELDING MACHINE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HEADS AND MONITORS; LASER MACHINE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, OPTO-MECHANICAL COMPONENTS FOR USE INSIDE AN ENCLOSURE, NAMELY, TOOLING PLATES AND LAB JACKS; HERMETIC SEALING MACHINES AND COMPONENTS, NAMELY, ATMOSPHERIC ENCLOSURES, GLOVEBOXES AND DRYBOXES FOR HERMETIC SEALING APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | FIBER LASERS FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE; ELECTRONIC WELD MONITORING AND DIAGNOSTIC TESTING UNITS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING THE TEXT AND GRAPHICS PRODUCED BY LASER EQUIPMENT FOR PLACING INDICIA ON PRODUCTS AND MACHINED PRODUCTS; RESISTANCE WELDING POWER SUPPLIES, ELECTRONIC RESISTANCE WELDING MONITORING AND DIAGNOSTIC TESTING UNITS, NAMELY, CHECKERS; LASER ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, LASER DIAGNOSTIC ACCESSORIES, BEING POWER METERS FOR MEASURING ELECTRICITY, AND PROCESS OBSERVATION AND VERIFICATION ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, MICROSCOPES AND PULL TESTERS; LASER SAFETY ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, SAFETY GOGGLES AND LABORATORY FUME EXTRACTION ENCLOSURES; ELECTRONIC MONITORS FOR MONITORING PULSE WIDTH AND WELD CYCLES FOR PRECISION WELDERS, RESISTANCE SPOT WELDERS AND CAPACITOR DISCHARGE WELDERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | WATER CHILLERS, NAMELY, TEMPERATURE CONTROL EQUIPMENT FOR LASERS AND RESISTANCE WELDERS FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Amanda Miyachi America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MIYACHI AMERICA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by MIYACHI AMERICA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named MIYACHI AMERICA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 7, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |