Drawing for ILAHU

USPTO serial 86090384

ILAHU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ILAHU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

RAJ ABHYANKER RAJ ABHYANKER, P.C.1580 W EL CAMINO REAL STE 8MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040-2462UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Multifunctional electronic devices for displaying, measuring, and uploading to the Internet information including time, distance, steps taken, activity level, and calories burned; pedometers; Electronic wearables, namely, audio headphones; Headsets for enhancing sounds for use with mobile telephones and computers; Headset component for sound enhancement for use with mobile telephones and computers; Electric or electronic sensors for detecting movement; Electric or electronic sensors for detecting vital signs, namely, blood pressure, heart rate, and calories burned; Multifunctional electronic devices for displaying, measuring, and uploading to the Internet information including time, date, body and heart rates, global positioning, direction, distance, altitude, speed, steps taken, calories burned, navigational information, weather information, the temperature, wind speed, and the declination of body and heart rates, altitude and speedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2014GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2014GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2014EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Jan 31, 2014CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance