Drawing for AQUA FORCE

USPTO serial 86090465

AQUA FORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOVELACE, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUA FORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Ims

PETER J. IMS WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KOEHLER, P.ASTE 1400900 2ND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Accessories in the nature of machine parts for power-operated pressure spraying systems, namely, spray guns, hand-held wands, spray nozzles, nozzle holders, nozzle tip protectors, pressure pumps, and sand blast headsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 7, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance