USPTO serial 86090535
HYDROVAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYDROVAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Heraeus Electro-Nite International N.V.
3530 Houthalen, BE
Other trademarks owned by Heraeus Electro-Nite International N.V.
LANGHORNE, PA
JOHNSON CITY, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul D. Bangor, Jr.
Paul D. Bangor, Jr. Clark Hill, PLC301 Grant St., 14th Fl.One Oxford CentrePittsburgh, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | hydrogen sensor system for determining the dissolved hydrogen concentration in molten metal comprising a probe, a recording means for analysis and visual display of hydrogen concentration auxiliary light and buzzer assembly and printer | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Heraeus Electro-Nite International N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by HERAEUS ELECTRO-NITE CO., LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KEYSTONE SENSORS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HYDROVAS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |