USPTO serial 86090974
OFFICER'S CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 23, 2016
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with OFFICER'S CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Allied Blenders And Distillers Private Limited
Mumbai, IN
Other trademarks owned by Allied Blenders And Distillers Private Limited
Allied Blenders And Distillers Private Limited
Mumbai, IN
Other trademarks owned by Allied Blenders And Distillers Private Limited
Allied Blenders And Distillers Private Limited
Mumbai, IN
Other trademarks owned by Allied Blenders And Distillers Private Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Reidl
Paul W. Reidl Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty1500 First Street. Ste 200Napa, CA 94559UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Water, namely, packaged drinking water, mineral and aerated waters; soft drinks, namely, soda; beer; fruit drinks and fruit juices; other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Allied Blenders And Distillers Private Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Allied Blenders And Distillers Private Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Allied Blenders And Distillers Private Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named OFFICER'S CHOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2024 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2022 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2016 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |