Drawing for MILLION VIEW

USPTO serial 86091362

MILLION VIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILLION VIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith E. Danish

KEITH E. DANISH Barclay Damon, LLP1270 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS STE 600NEW YORK, NY 10020-1704UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for displaying, browsing and retrieving images from personal computers and from the Internet; electronic publications, namely, downloadable photo books and photo collection booksACTIVE—
035Distribution of advertising materials; providing consumer product information, and information and advice to consumers regarding the selection of products and items to be purchased; providing information on photographs and other merchandise, namely, consumer productsACTIVE—
038Electronic transmission of electronic media, multimedia content, images, videos, text, user-generated content, and information via the Internet and other communications networksACTIVE—
041Providing a website for entertainment viewing purposes featuring images of works by professional photographers via a computer network; entertainment services, namely, providing a website for viewing purposes featuring photographic arts of professional photographers; educational services, namely, providing non-downloadable webinars, images, courses, texts, videos, and ongoing television programs, via the internet, in the field of photography and image editing; providing electronic publications, namely, non-downloadable photo books, photo collections, company newspapers and books in the field of photography technique via the InternetACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software programs for browsing and retrieving images, videos, user-generated content and information from the Internet; providing non-downloadable multimedia software programs via the internet featuring educational instruction in the field of photography and image editingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 28, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 17, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 4, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 30, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance