USPTO serial 86091427
MYOMEGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYOMEGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elijah E. Cocks
ELIJAH E. COCKS MUIRHEAD AND SATURNELLI, LLC200 FRIBEG PKWY STE 1001WESTBOROUGH, MA 02138UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatuses for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound and images; computer hardware for data processing; computers; computer software for mobile computing devices, controlling remote loads, connecting machines and processes; mobile phones; electronic circuits, integrated circuits, microcontrollers, radio receivers, printed circuit boards, printed circuits, semiconductors, and senders for electronic signals in the nature of transmitters of electronic signals; measuring apparatuses, namely, digitizers; electronic surveillance apparatuses, namely, electric and electronic audio and video surveillance installations, automated self-contained surveillance devices that can be deployed to gather evidence or intelligence in remote installations | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, providing internet chat rooms, providing online forums for transmission of messages among computer users, transmission of information by electronic communications networks, providing access to the Internet, providing telecommunications connections to the Internet, and providing access to databases | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research, analysis, testing in the field of mobile communications; research services and corresponding design services, namely, research and design in the field of mobile device hardware; industrial analysis and research in the field of mobile communication and the internet of things; design and development of mobile computing devices hardware and software; engineering services in the field of mobile computing devices and the internet of things; design of electronic circuits for others, design of integrated circuits for others, computer software design for mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |