Drawing for BECAUSE NOBODY LIKES NEEDLES!

USPTO serial 86091771

BECAUSE NOBODY LIKES NEEDLES!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BECAUSE NOBODY LIKES NEEDLES!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica Riva Talley

Monica Riva Talley Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.1100 New York Avenue N.W.Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Transdermal drug delivery patches sold without medicationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 11, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 11, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 30, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 22, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 22, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 30, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 30, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 23, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 2, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance