USPTO serial 86092802
BE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald M. Kachmarik
RONALD M. KACHMARIK COOPER LEGAL GROUP, LLC6505 ROCKSIDE RD STE 330INDEPENDENCE, OH 44131-2371UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for designing, installing and executing mainframe and client/server application programs, in the field of financial analysis, business and enterprise organization consultancy and business management; computer software for integrating the financial functions and functions for production and sales functions of a business in the field of financial analysis, business and enterprise organization consultancy and business management; computer software for the management of services supporting a business in the field of financial analysis, business and enterprise organization consultancy and business management; computer software for facilitating customer service, in the field of financial analysis, business and enterprise organization consultancy and business management; computer hardware and software for testing, monitoring and protecting computer networks and computer network equipment, in the field of financial analysis, business and enterprise organization consultancy and business management; computer software for use in database management, in the field of financial analysis, business and enterprise organization consultancy and business management; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, magazines, papers, newspapers in the field of financial analysis, business and enterprise organization consultancy and business management; downloadable electronic databases in the field of financial analysis, business and enterprise organization consultancy and business management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management and enterprise organization consultancy; business consultancy, namely, consultancy in management, business management methodology, human resources, and organizational business consultancy; assistance and consultancy for commercial business administration, enterprise organization and management; compilation of information in to computer databases; consultancy in connection with the efficiency of a company's organization and policies; consultancy in performance research for commercial and industrial businesses in the nature of business efficiency expert services; marketing and sales promotion for others; public relations; demonstration of goods; publication of publicity texts; publication of advertising text for advertising purposes; market studies; organization of competitions relating to business for commercial purposes; arranging and conducting of trade shows for commercial and advertising purposes; developing commercial strategies for businesses; human resource analysis and consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer engineering; design and development of plans for the reorganization of computer systems; development of methods for testing software; technical consultancy and expertise, namely, engineering services; quality control and technical assistance for operations on computer systems in the nature of engineering services; consultancy relating to computer projects in the nature of engineering services; technical project studies for design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; expertise and research relating to computer hardware systems of commercial and industrial businesses; computer hardware systems analysis services; computer programming services; research, study and expertise relating to appraisal of computer resources in the nature of engineering services; study and expertise relating to the development of computer hardware systems; technical support relating to computers, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; consultancy relating to the installation, improvement, modification, migration, use of computer configurations; analysis, optimization and reorganization of computer systems, namely, management, monitoring and finalization of software and computer systems in the nature of design and development of computer hardware and software; consultancy in the field of computer services, computer software and computer networks, namely, consultancy in the field of software, design and development of computers; management of computer infrastructures on behalf of industrial or commercial companies in the nature of engineering services; consultancy relating to the management, monitoring and finalization of computer systems in the nature of engineering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES SAS
- Other trademarks owned by BE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES SAS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 1, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |