Drawing for READY CRAFTED

USPTO serial 86092924

READY CRAFTED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with READY CRAFTED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Anne Matheson

JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Flavored milk; milk-based beverages containing coffee; milk-based beverage with chocolate; milk-based energy drinks; ready-to-drink milk based food beverages containing chocolate, excluding milkshakes; ready-to-drink milk based food beverages containing coffee, excluding milkshakes; non-carbonated milk-based soft drinksACTIVE—
030Coffee beverages; cocoa beverages; espresso beverages; beverages made with a base of coffee; beverages made with a base of espresso; beverages made with a base of chocolate; ready-to-drink coffee; beverages made with a base of unroasted coffeeACTIVE—
032Fruit drinks and soft drinks containing fruit juices; sparkling fruit and juice-based beverages, namely beverages containing fruit juices and soda beverages in the nature of soda pops; non-carbonated soft drinks; energy drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 17, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 17, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 14, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance