USPTO serial 86094289
FREIGHTMAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 2015
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FREIGHTMAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl L. Burbach
CHERYL L. BURBACH HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 MASTIN ST STE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210-1697UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Freight logistics management; providing a website that automates and manages price quotations and shipping logistics need that consists of recipient and sender information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 2013 |
| 038 | Providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning shipping, freight logistics, transportation, preparation of electronic messages; providing electronic mail templates and information provided by users via an electronics communications network; Wireless electronic transmission of data, documents, electronic mail, calendars, announcements, and photographs via an electronic communications network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 2013 |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring resources, namely, temporary use of non-downloadable software for shippers of freight using truck, rail, ocean or air transportation to communicate with carriers, and to manage pickup and delivery of shipments; computer services, namely, providing a website that automates and manages price quotations and shipping logistics need that consists of recipient and sender information; computer services, namely, providing freight logistics management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Freightquote.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Freightquote.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FREIGHTMAIL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2014 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2014 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2014 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |