USPTO serial 86094995
SOUTHFACEVILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOUTHFACEVILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SHLESINGER
JAMES E SHLESINGER SHLESINGER ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP5845 RICHMOND HWY STE 415ALEXANDRIA, VA 22303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | PROVIDING AN INTERNET PORTAL OFFERING INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF REAL ESTATE CONCERNING THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF NEW HOMES AND CONDOS | ACTIVE | Nov 24, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |