USPTO serial 86095095
SIGNED. SEALED. SECURED.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIGNED. SEALED. SECURED.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah M. Robertson
SARAH M. ROBERTSON DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP51 W 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10019-6119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software to facilitate the creation, processing, authentication and verification of digital and electronic signatures and for use in the encryption, electronic storage and electronic retrieval of documents | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to facilitate the creation, processing, authentication and verification of digital and electronic signatures and for use in the encryption, electronic storage and electronic retrieval of documents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |