USPTO serial 86095735
HEADPHONE:X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEADPHONE:X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calabasas, CA
Calabasas, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William L. Johnson
WILLIAM L. JOHNSON DTS, INC.5220 LAS VIRGENES RDCALABASAS, CA 91302-1064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio-visual receivers; CD players for automobiles; Computers; Digital audio players for automobiles; Digital music players, namely, digital audio players; DVD players for automobiles; Home entertainment products, namely, DVD players, CD players, optical disc players, digital media receivers, audio amplifiers, media players, audio-video receivers, surround sound systems, set-top boxes, wireless transmitters and receivers, televisions and monitors; Home theater systems comprising DVD players, CD players, optical disc players, digital media receivers, audio amplifiers, media players, audio-video receivers, surround sound systems, set-top boxes, wireless transmitters and receivers, televisions and monitors; Media players for automobiles; Portable listening devices, namely, MP3 players; Portable media players; Portable telephones | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Video game consoles for use with an external display screen or monitor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |