Drawing for RESINENCE

USPTO serial 86097763

RESINENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESINENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William R. Samuels

William R. Samuels Scarinci Hollenbeck3 Park AveFloor 15New York, NY 10016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Aluminium paints; abestos paints; Japan black, namely, Japanese lacquer (urushi); primers, badigeon, namely, cement coatings; bitumen varnish; whitewash; whites, namely, titanium white; wood dyes, wood coatings, namely, coatings for wood as paints, preservative coatings for wood surfaces, protective surface coatings for wood, preservatives against deterioration of wood; coatings for tarred felt in the nature of paint; ceramic paints; white lead; colorants, coatings, namely, anti-corrosive coatings, coatings comprised of cement, glazes, coatings in the nature of paints, gamboges for painting, shellac, gum resins, binding preparations for paints, mastic, paints, raw natural resins, dyes, namely, dyes for wood, dyes for general industrial use, varnishesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 2, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 16, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 25, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 3, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance