Drawing for MOBILE VAULT

USPTO serial 86097974

MOBILE VAULT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MOBILE VAULT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harris Gao

HARRIS GAO SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP333 S HOPE ST43RD FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90071-1422

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for providing mobile internet service, and for assessing, reporting, and preventing security risks and privacy risks on mobile communication devices; software for scanning mobile communication devices, and for assessing, reporting, and preventing security risks and privacy risks on mobile communication devices; software for providing secure storage of user data and preventing unwanted access to user data on mobile devices; downloadable publications in the nature of newsletters in the field of data storage delivered via electronic message; downloadable computer software for providing mobile internet service, and for assessing, reporting, and preventing security risks and privacy risks on mobile communication devices; computer game programs; downloadable music files via the internet and wireless devices; downloadable multimedia file containing artwork, text, audio, video, games and Internet Web links relating to data storage; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for managing data storage on mobile devices via the internet and wireless devices; downloadable electronic game software for use on mobile devicesABANDONEDMar 31, 2012
042Research, development, design and upgrading of computer software; updating of computer software; computer services, namely, data recovery services;computer software consulting; computer programming and software design; computer programming and software design; Maintenance of computer software; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of detection, monitoring, and removal of security risks and privacy risks, and for use in monitoring, protecting, and securing mobile communication devices and networksABANDONEDMar 31, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 27, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 27, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 27, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 9, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 16, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 2, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 9, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 5, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 4, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 15, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance