USPTO serial 86098532
RAZOR BACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAZOR BACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcee G Lundeen
JOHN W MONTGOMERY OSHA LIANG LLPTWO HOUSTON CENTER909 FANNIN ST STE 3500HOUSTON, TX 77010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER OPERATED DOWNHOLE TOOLS USED FOR THE DRILLING OF OIL AND GAS, NAMELY, POWER OPERATED DRILL BITS, REAMERS, CUTTERS, JUNK SUBS AND DEBRIS CATCHERS; POWER OPERATED WELL CLEANING DOWNHOLE TOOLS, namely, POWER OPERATED WIPERS, SCRAPERS, BRUSH TOOLS, POLISHERS AND SCOURERS FOR MAINTAINING A CLEAN INTERIOR OF A CASING OR LINER WITHIN A WELL BORE; POWER OPERATED FLUID FILTERS FOR SELECTIVELY FILTERING AND REMOVING SOLIDS FROM DOWN HOLE FLUIDS; POWER OPERATED FLUID CIRCULATORS THAT CAUSE DOWNHOLE FLUID TO IMPACT THE INTERIOR OF THE CASING OF A LINER WITHIN A WELL BORE TO PROVIDE A CLEANING ACTION AND WHICH SELECT A PATH FOR FLUID TRAVEL IN THE CASING OR A LINER WITHIN A WELL BORE; POWER OPERATED DOWNHOLE TOOLS FOR ISOLATING ZONES OR CREATING BARRIERS IN WELL CASINGS, NAMELY, ZONAL ISOLATION PACKERS, MUD PACKERS, PACKER INSTALLERS, INFLATABLE PACKERS AND PACKER SETTERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |