USPTO serial 86098868
CHARMS FOR CHARITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHARMS FOR CHARITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dara L. Onofrio
DARA L ONOFRIO ONOFRIO LAW24 W MAIN ST STE 329CLINTON, CT 06413-2053UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 11, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |