USPTO serial 86099495
EXER-BIOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXER-BIOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hamilton, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori K. Hall
LORI K. HALL GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLPONE MAIN STREET WESTHAMILTON, ONTARIO, L8P4Z5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food supplements, namely, probiotic exercise affected gut flora in various forms including capsules and liquid; Prebiotic and probiotic preparations for intestinal health; Probiotic products, namely, capsules and preparations made up of gut flora for promoting health and wellness; preparations made up of gut flora, namely, probiotic bacteria for the prevention and treatment of the digestive system and the skin and diseases related thereto; preparations containing probiotic exercise affected gut flora for the prevention and treatment of the digestive system and the skin and diseases related thereto; natural health products, namely, microbiological exercise affected gut flora extracts made of probiotic bacteria for the prevention and treatment of the digestive system and the skin and diseases related thereto; probiotic enriched yogurts; probiotic enriched yogurt beverages; Probiotic milk and probiotic whey drinks; Probiotic soy milk drinks and probiotic rice milk drinks, Medicated skin care preparations, namely, probiotic body creams for treating dermatological conditions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |