Drawing for LOOK BETTER

USPTO serial 86099592

LOOK BETTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOOK BETTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joel Karni Schmidt

Joel Karni Schmidt COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNew York, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring eyewear, sunglasses, eyeglass frames, eyewear and sunglass cases; online retail store services featuring eyewear, sunglasses, eyeglass frames, and eyewear and sunglass cases; home try-on services allowing consumers to sample eyewear and sunglasses before selection and purchase, namely, sample distribution; charitable services, namely, organizing and developing projects that aim to improve the lives of underprivileged and impoverished people; issuing gift certificates and gift cards which may be redeemed for goods; retail store services featuring chains and cords for eyeglasses and sunglasses, contact lenses and containers for contact lenses; online retail store services featuring chains and cords for eyeglasses and sunglasses, contact lenses and containers for contact lensesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 6, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Aug 29, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 29, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 8, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 6, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 30, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 4, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 4, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 28, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 28, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Sep 21, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 21, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 11, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 11, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 19, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 28, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 12, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 25, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 7, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 6, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 6, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 29, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 26, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance