USPTO serial 86100773
IOPLATFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IOPLATFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seongnam-si Gyeonggi-d, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Paul Mitchell
888 16TH ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-4104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Development of game software, Rental of a database server (to third parties), Development of data processing programs, Developing of driver and operating system software, Programming of multimedia applications, Design of semiconductors or integrated circuits, design of semiconductors, Design of semiconductor chips, Hosting web sites relating to real estate, Recovery of damaged computer programs, Web design, Web site development, Web site management, Web site design, Web site maintenance, Creating and maintaining web sites for others, Hosting computer sitesweb sites, Rental of web servers, Web page design, Rental of application software, Providing search engines for the internet, Providing internet security programs, Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media, Management of web sites for electronic commerce, Maintenance of web sites for electronic commerce, Computer programming for electronic commerce, IC design, Design of integrated circuits, Data conversion of computer programs and data, Development of computer game software, Duplication of computer game software, Maintenance of computer game software, Computer game programming, Analysis(computers), Consultancy(computers), Research(computers), Advisory services relating to computers, Computer rental, Computer data (Recovery of), Design of computer microchips, Computer virus protection services, Consultancy(computer security), Computer software development, Rental of computer software, Computer software design, Computer software consultancy, Computer software (Design of), Computer software (Installation of), Repair of computer software, Computer software (Updating of), Computer software research, Computer software (Maintenance of), Advisory and development service of computer softwares, Computer system design, Computer systems analysis, Design and development of computer systems, Computer rental, Computer programming, Data conversion of computer programs and data, Development of computer programs, Computer programs (Duplication of), Rental and translation of computer programs, Computer hardware development , Computer hardware (Design of), Computer hardware (Consultancy in the field of) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 9, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |